A Peasant Leaving His Landlord on Yuriev Day, Sergei V. Ivanov, (1908)
Serfdom in Russia like European feudalism
Serfdom only abolished in 1861 by Emperor Alexander II
Source: Acemoglu and Robinson (2012: 109).
Czar Nicholas II
1868-1917
Russian Empire ruled by the Romanovs
A feudal, agrarian society
Nobody, not even Marx, expected socialism in Russia
Protestors facing soldiers at the Narva Gate, St. Petersburg
Czar Nicholas II addresses the Duma
October Manifesto:
Forced Russian Constitution of 1906
Entry into WWI (1914-1918)
Germans authorized Vladimir Lenin (in exile in Geneva) to return back to Russia to foment revolution
Humilating 1918 Treaty of Brest-Livotsk (concluded by Bolsheviks)
Russia exits WWI
Gives Baltic states to Germany, recognizes independent Ukraine
Abandons its alliances with France and Britain
February Revolution in the capital (Petrograd/St. Petersberg)
Czar Nicholas II abdicates the throne
Duma siezes control of the country, forms the Provisional Government
The Provisional Government
Kadet party: Western-liberal intellectuals
Socialist Revolutionary Party: rural countryside socialists
Mensheviks: urban socialists
Bolsheviks: radical socialists under Lenin
Lenin's idea of a vanguard of professional revolutionaries that must seize power to establish Marx's dictatorship of the proletariat
"Telescope through history" from feudalism past (nonexistant in Russia) bourgeois capitalist straight to socialism
Aleksandr Kerensky
Provisional government had de jure control over Russia
Progressive legislation (in contrast to Czar)
Still in WWI
Most communities and urban centers were creating their own workers soviets (councils)
The de facto power was the Petrograd Soviet in the capital
"We (the Provisional Government) do not have authority, but only the appearance of authority; the real power lies with the Soviet" - Minister of War Alexander Guchkov
Bolsheviks violently seize control of the Petrograd Soviet and Provisional Government
Slogan: "all power to the soviets"
Capture and shoot the entire Romanov family
Conclude Brest-Livotsk treaty to end the war
Establish the Cheka (secret police) to weed out "enemies of the people"
Civil war amongs the "Reds" (Bolsheviks) and:
Bolsheviks win by 1921 and create the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR/CCCP)
Boettke (2001: 129)
Boettke, Peter J, 2001, Calculation and Coordination, Chs. 6-7
Roberts, Paul Craig, 1970, "War Communism: A Reexamination," Slavic Review 29(2): 238-261
"Comrades! The insurrection of five kulak districts should be pitilessly suppressed. The interests of the whole revolution require this because 'the last decisive battle' with the kulaks is now under way everywhere. An example must be demonstrated."
Hang (absolutely hang, in full view of the people) no fewer than one hundred known kulaks, filthy rich men, bloodsuckers.
Publish their names.
Seize all grain from them.
Designate hostages - in accordance with yesterday's telegram.
Do it in such a fashion, that for hundreds of verst around the people see, tremble, know, shout: "strangling (is done) and will continue for the bloodsucking kulaks".
Telegraph the receipt and the implementation. Yours, Lenin.
"P.S. Find more reliable people"
Vladimir Lenin
(1870-1924)
"[H]ave councils of workers and servants been formed in the difference sections of the city; have the workers been armed; have the bourgeoisie been disarmed...have the capitalist factories and wealth in Munich and the capitalist farms in its environs been confiscated; have mortgage and rent payments by small peasants been canceled; have the wages of farm labourers and unskilled workers been doubled or trebeled; have all paper stocks and all printing-presses been confiscated so as to enable popular leaflets and newspapers to be printed for the masses; has the six-hour working day with two or three-hour instruction in state administration been introduced; have the bourgeoisie in Munich been made to give up surplus housing so that workers may be immediately moved into comfortable flats; have you taken over all the banks; have you taken hostages from the ranks of the bourgeoisie...have all the workers been mobilised for defence and for ideological propaganda in the neighboring villages?"
Lenin, Vladimir, 1977, "Message of Greetings to the Bavarian Soviet Republic", Collected Works, Vol. 4
Vladimir Lenin
(1870-1924)
"The dictatorship of the proletariat, i.e. the organization of the vanguard of the oppressed as the ruling class for the purpose of suppressing the oppressors, cannot result merely in an expansion of democracy. Simultaneously, with an immense expansion of democracy, which, for the first time, becomes democracy for the poor, democracy for the people, and not democracy for the money-bags, the dictatorship of the proletariat imposes a series of restrictions on the freedom of the oppressors, the exploiters, the capitalists. We must suppress them in order to free humanity from wage slavery,their resistance must be crushed by force; it is clear that there is no freedom and no democracy where there is suppression and where there is violence," (pp.62-65).
Lenin, Vladimir, 1917, The State and Revolution
Utterly destroys Russian economy
Moscow depopulated by 50%, Petrograd by 60%
National income falls by 60% from 1913-level
Industrial output falls by 80% from 1913-level
Millions of peasants die from famine (collective agriculture)
1921 Kronstadt rebellion of workers against Bolsheviks
Boettke, Peter J, 2001, Calculation and Coordination, Chs. 6-7
Roberts, Paul Craig, 1970, "War Communism: A Reexamination," Slavic Review 29(2): 238-261
Vladimir Lenin
(1870-1924)
"We made the mistake of deciding to go over directly to communist production and distribution...We expected---or perhaps it would be truer to say that we presumed without having given it adequate consideration---to be able to organize the state production and the state distribution of products on communist lines in a small peasant country directly as ordered by the proletarian state. Experience has proved that we were wrong," (p.58).
Lenin, Vladimir, 1921, "The Fourth Anniversary of the October Revolution," Pravda (October 18, 1921) p.58
Vladimir Lenin
(1870-1924)
"We followed for more than three years, up to the spring of 1921...a revolutionary approach to the problem---to break up the social-economic system completely at one stroke and to substitute a new one for it. [We have been adopting] a reformist type of method [in order] to revive trade, petty proprietorship, capitalism. [C]ompared with the previous, revolutionary approach, it is a reformist approach...If, after trying revolutionary methods, you find they have failed and adopt reformist methods, does it not prove that you are declaring the revolution to have been a mistake in general?," (p.110).
Lenin, Vladimir, 1921, "The Importance of Gold"
New Economic Policy
Restores private property and money
Citizens allowed to keep economic surplus and exchange for profit
Limited free trade
"Socialism" in name only
Lenin dies in 1924, what did he really want for the USSR?
Boettke, Peter J, 2001, Calculation and Coordination, Chs. 6-7
Roberts, Paul Craig, 1970, "War Communism: A Reexamination," Slavic Review 29(2): 238-261
"The kindness of Stalin illuminates the future for children"
Stalin consolidates power through 1928
"Socialism in One Country" vs. international proletarian revolution
Period of "classical socialism" (1924-1953)
Five-Year Plans under GOSPLAN begin in 1928
Gregory, Paul and Mark Harrison, 2005, "Allocation under Dictatorship: Research in Stalin's Archives," American Economic Review 43(3): 721-761
Forced collectivization of agriculture
Collapse of agricultural output
Holodomor in Ukraine: 7-10 million die of (intentional) famine
"The disappearing comrade" Nikolai Yehzov (head of NKVD)
The Great Terror and Great Purge 1936-1938
Purges and show trials of prominent Bolsheviks
GULAG sustem of forced labor camps in Siberia
KBG and self-policing, political violence against "counterrevolutionary behavior"
Personality cult
Gregory, Paul and Mark Harrison, 2005, "Allocation under Dictatorship: Research in Stalin's Archives," American Economic Review 43(3): 721-761
"Official Soviet portrait" of Pavel Morozov
The story of Pavlik Morozov emblematic of a self-policing society
No organization or organizing possible outside of Party-approved organs
"Strengthen working discipline in collective farms"
Nikita Khruschev
1894-1971
Stalin dies in 1953, Nikita Khruschev (ultimately) becomes leader
Denunciation of Stalin's personality cult & de-Stalinization, less repression
Textbooks showed vast Soviet growth outstripping United States
Khruschev aimed at reforms to improve the lives of Soviet citizens, routinely botched
Deposed in 1964 → Brezhnev → Andropov → Chernenko → Gorbachev
"Economic growth" stops in 1970s
"It was part of the five-year plans, approved by the council of ministers and the Politburo. Nobody on a lower level would dare to say a word contradicting those plans, even if it was the fate of the Aral Sea."
Mikhail Gorbachev
1931-
Gorbachev becomes Party leader in 1985, goal of reform
"Glasnost ("openness") to open up press and speech
"Perestroika" ("restructuring") relaxes central planning, allows some property rights, market competition, and trade
Nationalist risings, dissolution of Soviet Union in 1991
"Perestroika is a reliance on the living creativity of the masses"
Boris Yeltsen denouncing the attempted coup atop a tank
Gorbachev's "Sinatra Doctrine" allowed other Soviet satellite states to determine their own affairs
The "Fall of Nations" and Fall of the Berlin Wall 1989
Tension between gov'ts of individual Soviet Republics (including Russia, led by President Boris Yeltsen) and the Soviet government in Moscow
Hardline communists attempt a coup against Gorbachev in August 1991, nonviolent resistance by Yeltsen
Gorbachev resigns as the President of the USSR
Dissolved in 1991 into 15 countries
"Yeltsin, then 58, "roamed the aisles of Randall's nodding his head in amazement," wrote Asin. He told his fellow Russians in his entourage that if their people, who often must wait in line for most goods, saw the conditions of U.S. supermarkets, "there would be a revolution."
"Yeltsin asked customers about what they were buying and how much it cost, later asking the store manager if one needed a special education to manage a store. In the Chronicle photos, you can see him marveling at the produce section, the fresh fish market, and the checkout counter. He looked especially excited about frozen pudding pops."
Source: Houston Chronicle
"Even the Politburo doesn't have this choice. Not even Mr. Gorbachev," he said. When he was told through his interpreter that there were thousands of items in the store for sale he didn't believe it. He had even thought that the store was staged, a show for him. Little did he know there countless stores just like it all over the country, some with even more things than the Randall's he visited.
"The fact that stores like these were on nearly every street corner in America amazed him. They even offered him free cheese samples."
Source: Houston Chronicle
"The captain of the Council of Soviets guides us from victory to victory!"
Recall the socialist calculation debate (Lesson 3)
Mises (1920) argued that rational allocation of resources under socialism was impossible
But the Soviet Union lasted for about 70 years!
How did "socialism" and "central-planning" work in the Soviet economy?
No private property, collective ownership of production
GOSPLAN would supposedly create a central plan for the economy
Individuals lived in collective apartments (in cities) or on collective farms (in countryside)
Directed by GOSPLAN about where to work, what to produce, how much to produce (output quotas)
Threats to noncompliance
Goods sold at State-owned stores at controlled prices
"Komsomol [Communist Youth] is the shock brigade of the 5-year plan"
Selectorate theory: Stalin had extremely high loyalty norm
Stalin had enormous discretionary power over how resources are used
Soviets could have world-leading heavy industry, military, and space programs
Massive gains in industrial output and "economic growth" by coercively militarizing labor, forced savings, and creating capital
Yet the country can still have shortages of food and clothing for their citizens
People turned to black markets, privileges, bribes, bartering favors, in order to acquire basic goods and services
""We pretend to work, and you pretend to pay us!"
Peter Boettke
"The mercantilist model includes the following major elements:
Boettke, Peter, J, (2001), "Soviet Venality," in Calculation and Coordination
Loyal supporters have a stake in the system, residual claim ion the incomes of their offices
NWW natural state logic: ensure elites' marginal benefits of rents > possibility of resistance
Monitor each other to prevent competitive erosion of rents
No secure property rights in rent flows
Network of informations to protect existing rent flows
Boettke, Peter, J, (2001), "Soviet Venality," in Calculation and Coordination
"Central planning" board set output quotas
Plans were set more by political connections than economic needs
Gosplan did not give specifics, intentionally vague and changeable, always "a draft" never finalized
Network of "apparatchniks", petty dictatorships managing their own planning fiefdoms
Boettke, Peter, J, (2001), "Soviet Venality," in Calculation and Coordination
"Who needs this nail?"
"Don't worry about it! The main thing is that we immediately fulfilled the plan for nails!
"Output targets were usually based on previous production levels. This created a huge incentive never to expand output, since this only meant having to produce more in the future, since future targets would be "ratcheted up." Underachievement was always the best way to meet targets and get the bonus," (Acemoglu and Robinson 2011, p.130).
"When the plan was formulated in tons of steel sheet, the sheet was made too heavy. When it was formulated in terms of area of steel sheet, the sheet was made too thin. When the plan for chandeliers was made in tons, they were so heavy, they could hardly hang from cielings." (p.130).
"A whole set of laws created criminal offenses for workers that were perceived to be shirking...[A] law made absenteeism, defined as twenty minutes unauthorized absence or even idling on the job, a criminal offense that could be punished by six months' hard labor...between 1940 and 1955, 36 million people, about one-third of the adult population, were found guilty of such offenses. Of these, 15 million were sent to prison, and 25,000 were shot. In any year, there would be 1 million adults in prison for labor violations; this is not to mention the 2.5 million people Stalin exiled to the gulags of Siberia," (p.131).
"As for Gosplan, its main role was to provide Stalin with information so he could better monitor his friends and enemies. It actually tried to avoid making decisions. If you made a decision that turned out badly, you might get shot. Better to avoid all responsibility," (Acemoglu and Robinson 2011: 129).
Consider a market with a market-clearing price of P1 where Q1 will be exchanged
Government sets a price ceiling at ˉP, legal maximum price allowed
Qd>Qs: excess demand, a shortage!
Sellers will not supply more than Qs
Consider a market with a market-clearing price of P1 where Q1 will be exchanged
Government sets a price ceiling at ˉP, legal maximum price allowed
Qd>Qs: excess demand, a shortage!
Sellers will not supply more than Qs
For Qs units, buyers are willing to pay Pb!
If prices were allowed to adjust: buyers would bid higher prices to get the scarce Qs goods
Sellers would respond to rising willingness to pay, and produce and sell more
Until we return to P1 where Qd=Qs in equilibrium
But the price is not allowed to rise above ˉP!
Official price is ˉP, sellers gain monetary revenues
Competition exists between buyers to obtain scarce Qs goods
Goods are distributed by non-market means:
Rents to those who can distribute the scarce goods
A typical grocery store in Vilnius, Soviet-controlled Lithuania, 1990
"[G]oods shortages became endemic in the Soviet economy...A worker from the Urals wrote that to get bread in his town you had to stand in line from 1 or 2 o'clock at night, sometimes earlier, and wait for almost 12 hours...Bread was not the only thing in short supply. The situation was no better with other basic foodstuffs like meat, milk, butter, and vegetables, not to mention necessities like salt, soap, kerosene, and matches. Fish disappeared too, even from regions with substantial fishing industries...Clothing, shoes, and all kinds of consumer goods were in even shorter supply than basic foodstuffs, often being completely unobtainable...Meanwhile, people lived in communal apartments, usually one family to a room...even the best connections and official status often failed to secure a separate apartment.
Fitzpatrick, Sheila, (1999), Everyday Stalinism, pp.42-7
"The list of scarce items is practically endless. They are not permanently out of stock, but their appearance is unpredictable...Leningrad can be overstocked with cross-country skis and yet go several months without soap for washing dishes. In the Armenian capital of Yerevan, I found an ample supply of accordians but local people complained that they had gone for weeks without ordinary kitchen spoons or tea samovars. I knew a Moscow family that spent a frantic month hunting for a child's potty while radios were a glut on the market..."
"In an economy of chronic shortages and carefully parceled-out privileges, blat is an essential lubricant of life. The more rank and power one has, the more blat one normally has...each has access to things or services that are hard to get and that other people want or need."
Smith, Hedrick, (1976). Consumers: The Art of Queuing, in The Russians
Not in the interest of shopkeepers or Soviet officials to allow (higher) market clearing prices!
Setting prices low to shortage levels ˉP creates a de facto property right to allocate scarce desired goods
Incentive: convert control rights into cash flow rights as soon as possible
Trade favor of your access to goods for favors from other people, to otherwise inaccessible goods
Boettke, Peter, 2001, "Soviet Venality," in Calculation and Coordination
Levy, David, 1990, "The Bias in Centrally Planned Prices," Public Choice 63(3): 213-226
"Dear customer, in the leather goods department of our store, a shipment of 500 imported womens' purses has been recieved. Four hundred and fifty of them have been bought by employees of the store. Fourty-nine are under the counter and have been ordered in advance for friends. One purse is in the display window. We invite you to visit the leather department to buy this purse!" (p.38).
White, Lawrence H, 2012, The Clash of Economic Ideas, pp.38-9
Boris Yeltsen first president of Russian Federation
Transition to a market economy:
"Shock therapy" recommended by United States and IMF
Rodrik, Dani, 2006, "Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion?" Journal of Economic Literature 44(4): 973-987
"During the last 15 years [2005], Russia has undergone an extraordinary transformation. It has changed from a communist dictatorship to a multiparty democracy in which officials are chosen in regular elections. Its centrally planned economy has been reshaped into a capitalist order based on markets and private property. Its army has withdrawn peacefully from both eastern Europe and the other former Soviet republics, allowing the latter to become independentt countries," (p.20).
"Russia has come to be viewed as a disastrous failure and the 1990s as a decade of catastrophe for its people. Journalists, politicians, and academics have described Russia not as a middle-income country struggling to overcome its communist past and find its place in the world, but as a collapsed state inhabited by criminals and threatening other countries with multiple contagions," (p.20).
Shleifer, Andrei and Daniel Treisman, 2004, "A Normal Country," Foreign Affairs: April 2004
"Russia's economic and political systems remain far from perfect. But their defects are typical of countries at a similar level of economic development. Russia was in 1990, and is today [2005], a middle-income country, with GDP per capita around $8,000 [in 2005] (at purchasing power parity) according to the UN - comparable to Argentina in 1991 and Mexico in 1999. Almost all democracies in this income range are rough around the edges: their governments suffer from corruption, their judiciaries are policized, and their press is almost never entirely free. They have high income inequality, concentrated corporate ownership, and turbulent macroeconomic performance. In all of these regards, Russia is quite normal. Nor are the common flaws of middle-income capitalist democracies incompatible with further economic and political progress - if they were, western Europe and the United States would never have left the nineteenth century," (p.21).
Shleifer, Andrei and Daniel Treisman, 2004, "A Normal Country," Foreign Affairs: April 2004
"To say that Russia has become a "normal" middle-income country is not to overlook the messiness of its politics and economics, nor to excuse the failures of its leaders.The average middle-income country is not a secure or socially just place to live. Nor is it to say that all middle-income countries are exactly alike. No other such country has Russia's nuclear arms or its pivotal role in international affairs. Yet other countries around Russia's level of income-from Mexico and Brazil to Malaysia and Croatia-face a common set of economic problems and political challenges, from similarly precarious vantagepoints. Russia's struggles to meet such challenges strikingly resemble the experiences of many of its peers," (p.21).
Shleifer, Andrei and Daniel Treisman, 2004, "A Normal Country," Foreign Affairs: April 2004
"Officially measured output fell in all the post-communist economies of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. It declined in new democracies, such as Russia and Poland; in continuing dictatorships, such as Belarus and Tajikistan; in rapid reformers, such as the Czech Republic and Hungary; and in very slow reformers, such as Ukraine and Uzbekistan...Officially measured output began to recover almost everywhere after a few years," (p.25).
Shleifer, Andrei and Daniel Treisman, 2004, "A Normal Country," Foreign Affairs: April 2004
Russia and post-Soviet states experienced sharp recessions in 1990s after transition out of communism
Recall: permanent shortage economy under Soviet socialism!
Under Soviet socialism, no private property, all organizations were owned by the State
Privatization, auction of State-owned enterprises to private hands
Rise of the "oligarchs"
"A popular theory holds that Russia's economic decline was caused by certain misguided government policies pursued in the 1990s. Particularly damaging, so the argument goes, were Yeltsin's privatization programs and his "loans for shares" scheme. The privatization program, implemented between 1993 and 1994, transferred shares in most firms from the government to managers, workers, and the public. This meant that by 1994, almost 70% of the Russian economy was in private hands. The loans for shares scheme,inaugurated in 1995, provided for the transfer of shares in a few state-owned natural resource enterprises to major businessmen in exchange for loans to the government. It accelerated the consolidation of a few large financial groups, led by the so-called oligarchs, whose subsequently enjoyed great political and economic influence."
"However...the effects of privatization and loans for shares could not have caused Russia's economic contraction. Most of the fall of [GDP] occured prior to 1994, before the significant part of the mass privatization program was completed and the loans for shares program was even contemplated. After 1994-when the effects of privatization could be felt- Russia's economic decline actually slowed, with rapid growth starting in 1999."
Shleifer, Andrei and Daniel Treisman, 2004, "A Normal Country," Foreign Affairs: April 2004
"Some argue the excessively speedy reform exacerbated the decline and compare the "gradualism" of China's economic policies favorably with the "shock therapy" of Russia's. In fact, there is no obvious relationship between the speed of reform and change in official output among the east European and former Soviet countries. The group of countries that contracted least, according to the official figures, includes both rapid reformers (such as Estonia, Poland, and the Czech Republic) and slow or nonreformers (such as Belarus and Uzbekistan). Those with the largest declines also include both the nonreformers (Tajikistan, Turkmenistan) and some that tried to reform (Moldova).
"Comparing Russia and Ukraine is particularly instructive. Ukraine had a large population (about 52 million in 1991), an industrial economy, significant natural resources, and a political culture similar to Russia's prior to transition. Unlike Russia, it retained the old communist leadership, albeit renamed, and pursued more cautious reforms, keeping a much larger share of the economy in state hands. Yet its official GDP per capita dropped 45 percent between 1991 and 2001--almost twice as much as Russia's," (p.25-26)
Shleifer, Andrei and Daniel Treisman, 2004, "A Normal Country," Foreign Affairs: April 2004
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
Esc | Back to slideshow |